![]() ![]() We can also conclude that since there is no agreement on the definition of legal language, there is a risk of over-simplifying jurisprudence in relation to the study of legal language. which speech acts should be the subject of our interest and taken into account. Footnote 1 In order to determine what should be within the scope of our examination, we need to find out first what are the borders and limits of legal language, i.e. Despite that, approaches to the description of legal language vary and research often focuses only on a selected segment of legal language. Language is not only essential for understanding the law and comprehending its content, it is the very foundation for the existence of law. Recently, it has become clearer how apt these statements are, and how the study of language is playing an increasingly important role in law and jurisprudence. There can be no doubt about their accuracy. Tiersma’s extraordinary book exploring legal language. Words are also a lawyer’s most essential tools.” These sentences can be found at the very beginning of Peter M. This means that a particular act may be considered a part of legal language not in accordance with a certain form or lexicon used, but mainly by extralinguistic circumstances in the context of which it is being performed. This concept argues that the ‘legal’ nature of language should be determined by the context and function of the particular statement or exchange, in connection with the role of participants in the communication. Taking into account these findings, I propose a novel comprehensive demarcation of legal language. Based on analysis of how the given term is currently defined, I draw out the common features and trace the characteristics in which they differ. The aim of this article is therefore to clearly delineate the boundaries of this concept. Accordingly, in this search for the definition of legal language, we should not neglect the fact that language is executed in concrete communicative acts, and the only means to grasp the language is through communication. In order to avoid this superficiality in subsequent research, it is first necessary to come to a clear determination of which communicative acts can be considered a part of legal language and which cannot. This lack of interest might be rooted in the uncertainty of whether these texts or utterances even fall under the scope of the concept of legal language. Some types of legal communication seem to be neglected. Nevertheless, not all of these categories are sufficiently researched. Almost all of the approaches conclude that legal language entails several types of communication. Despite that, the definitions of legal language vary. Many legal theorists and linguists have addressed the notion of legal language from different perspectives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |